Monkton Debunks climate fears in Copenhagen

Monckton names names on ClimateGate


Lord Monckton on Climategate at the 2nd International Climate Conference from CFACT on Vimeo.

Some skeptics will say but wait a minute, there is this new study on the ice being "rotten", you can read it more here to debunk this one also.

Other skeptics will say, wait there is the sea level rise, like Tuvalu.  Here some links to debug this one also. One from Willis Eschenbac, this one by Vincent Gray and this by John Daly. Here's a detailed analysis of sea level rise.

Others will say... But But.. You can read on any concern you have here by a simple search.

Climategate revelations 'are but the tip of a giant iceberg'

Source

Extract

There has been an unrelenting quarter century of one-sided indoctrination of the western world by the media and by various scientists and governments concerning a coming carbon dioxide (CO_2 ) induced global warming disaster. These warming scenarios have been orchestrated by a combination of environmentalists, vested interest scientists wanting larger federal grants and publicity, the media which profits from doomsday scenario reporting, governmental bureaucrats who want more power over our lives, and socialists who want to level-out global living standards. These many alarmist groups appear to have little concern over whether their global warming prognostications are accurate, however. And they most certainly are not. The alarmists believe they will be able to scare enough of our citizens into believing their propaganda that the public will be willing to follow their advice on future energy usage and agree to a lowering of their standard of living in the name of climate salvation.

Votre signe astrologique. En êtes vous sur?

Capsule scientifique du code Chasteney:

l'astrologie déphasée Notre signe astrologique correspond à la constellation du Zodiaque vis-à-vis laquelle le Soleil se trouvait le jour de notre naissance. Mais ces données datent de 2000 ans et le Soleil s’est déplacé dans le ciel depuis. Notre signe n’est donc plus celui qu’on pense!

Lien vers la capsule vidéo

C'est intéressant de voir l'importance porté par une grande partie de la population au signe astrologique. J'aimerais bien voir la réaction des "croyants" qui vont apprendre que tout leur vie durant, leur signe n'était pas le bon!!!

Si vous ne connaissez pas encore cette merveilleuse émission scientifique à téléquébec, visitez ce site.

Kids innocence exploited

This is simply disgusting

Source

GW alarmists continue their exploitation of children

Posted: 09 Dec 2009 09:34 AM PST

This, I think, has to go down as one of the creepiest “editorials” written by global warming alarmists recently. Clive Hamilton, ABC News in Australia’s public “intellectual,” has an open letter to the child of someone who works for the fossil fuel industry. Here are some selections:

“Hi there,

There’s something you need to know about your father.

Your dad’s job is to try to stop the government making laws to reduce Australia’s carbon pollution. He is paid a lot of money to do that by big companies who do not want to own up to the fact that their pollution is changing the world’s climate in very harmful ways.

Because of their pollution, lots of people, mostly poor people, are likely to die. They will die from floods, from diseases like dengue fever, and from starvation when their crops won’t grow anymore.

The big companies are putting their profits before the lives of people. And your dad is helping them.

. . . . .

I am sure it’s hard for you to hear these words, but there is something you can do to help. Why not sit your dad down and have a good talk to him. Tell him you want him to stop helping the big companies that are spoiling the future for you and all the other kids at school. Tell him that the family would rather have less money if he had a different job, one you could be proud of.

Tell him that you know he will feel much happier inside if he is doing something to make Australia and the world a better place, instead of going to work every day to make it a worse one.

Your dad has lost his way, and you might be the only person in the world who can help him find it again. So talk to him.

Yours sincerely”

This is on par with the official opening video for the COP15 meeting in Copenhagen – full of nightmare visions of a child caught in a global-warming-produced catastrophe - producing earthquakes, no less. (It’s very well-produced, of course.)

Do these people have any idea what their fear-mongering is doing to the minds of children - other than making them terrified, anxious, and sleep-deprived?

RDI propage les mensonges sur le ClimateGate

Ce matin à RDI, nous avons entendu que les courriels du ClimateGate dataient de 10 ans.

Est-ce vrai?

Une simple recherche sur les fichiers que j’ai téléchargés sur mon serveur linux prouve le contraire.

Un simple grep nous montre la vérité.

Voici le format de Date des courriels (quelques uns en 2009) :

1257874826.txt:Date: Tue Nov 10 12:40:26 2009
1257881012.txt:Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 14:23:32 -0500
1257888920.txt:Date: Tue Nov 10 16:35:20 2009
1257888920.txt: Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 15:35:37 +0000
1258039134.txt:Date: Thu Nov 12 10:18:54 2009
1258053464.txt:Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 14:17:44 -0000

Voici un compte du nombre de courriels pour les dates 2009 à 2006.

grep Date: *.txt | grep 2009 | wc -l
163
grep Date: *.txt | grep 2008 | wc -l
151
grep Date: *.txt | grep 2007 | wc -l
103
grep Date: *.txt | grep 2006 | wc –l
206

Mise à jour:
RDI m'a répondu en quelque minute avec ceci:

rdimatin @SimonFili Les courriels cités par tous les médias qui parlent "d'astuces" et qui ont donné place à la controverse datent de novembre 1999.

rdimatin @SimonFili Est-ce un "mensonge" de votre part de ne parler que des courriels récents dans votre post?

Intéressant de voir ces réponses. Ils affirment en onde que ces courriels datent de 10 ans, ceci donne l'impression que ces informations sont veilles donc sans grande importances.

Il me demande si c'est un mensonge de ne parler que des courriels récents??? La je ne comprends pas. Le point que je fessais était sur le fait que c'est courriels ne dataient pas seulement de 10 ans.

L'information aurait du être comme ceci: Ces courriels couvrent une plage de 10 ans.

RDI devrait s'inspiré de Rex Murphy à la CBC.

Pour des analyses approfondies voir ce site.

Mise à jour #2
Steve McIntyre à fait une analyse approfondie des trucs utilisé par le CRU (ClimateGate). Nous voyons des indices dans des email de 2008. Donc une autre "preuve" que c'est email ne sont pas vieux de 10 ans comme prétendais RDI.