Statisticians reject global cooling?

In this latest article to it the news, you can read the statisticians reject global cooling.

So what other scientist are saying about this?

Roger A. Pielke, Sr. has a different perspective on this paper that you can read here.

The article (and apparently the NOAA study itself), therefore, suffers from a significant oversight since it does not comment on an update of the same upper ocean heat content data that Jim Hansen has used to assess global warming.

From my point of view, the global temperature will keep fluctuating, going up or down for multiple reasons as you can see in this graph. The important observation to see here is the relation between CO2 and temperature.

You can always find any trend in a graph depending on the start and end point.
The point is: Is there a good relation between CO2 and Temperature? All the talks, taxes, laws and other crazy things being put in place is supposed to be because CO2 will kill us all. Not because there is a trend somewhere in some data set. Someone somewhere will find this specific data set(s) the prove that the globe is warming or cooling. But what about CO2 and temperature?

I am a global warming skeptics, where is my money from big oil? I am waiting!

According to this PR executive James Hoggan, everybody who is a skeptic about climate change, global warming or anything about the climate is a "recipient of corporate funds" that protects the industry against regulation that could prevent climate change.... Listen to this:

But who his James Hoggan... Read this article to know more.

Like you can read on my blog, I debate the science, I am pro clean energy, I am for getting rid of fossil fuels ASAP and have no link whatsoever with any corporate entity. I am only here to protect the future of the human race.

Anyway, there is no or little links between green house gases produced by humans and climate changes. So all of this debate is for nothing... Only produces more CO2... So SHUT-UP.

Video of the week... How nuclear energy works...

I wonder why we don't see those simple explanation anymore?

Two excellent video on climate change.

First : Climate chains

Climate Chains from Climate Chains on Vimeo.
An Epic debate is underway in our country. Proposed climate legislation would have a far-reaching impact on your standard of living and give government a portal into every aspect of our lives. The affordable, dependable and abundant energy upon which any great civilization is build is about to be rationed. Climate Chains is our effort to engage the culture, to petition a more reasoned approach to the intellectual debate that to often gets lost or overlooked in the irrational rush to pass climate legislation in an atmosphere of national and global panic. When you’ve built the greatest civilization in human history, fundamental changes in the economics of that system must be made with the most sober of consideration.



Second : Christopher Monckton Speaking at Bethel University Play the video, and use the arrow to change the slide of the presentation.

Power point (pdf) of the presentation:

Christopher Monckton Speaking at Bethel University

Video:

How to simulate data and graphics that shows the world is warming

Here's a great analysis done in excel that shows how to recreate the infamous hokey stick that showed that world as warmed in the last century. Bottom line, when you eliminate data that does not fit your theory, your theory become "true". Here, they used random data created in excel, eliminated data sets that did not fit the warming and averaged the data that fitted the warming and by magic, it fits, remember, this is random data sets!. Click on the graph for more details.