Voici la question qui me guide dans mes recherches...

L’appât du gain manifesté par les entreprises supranationales et certains groupes oligarchiques, de même que le contrôle des ressources naturelles par ceux-ci, dirigent l’humanité vers un nouvel ordre mondial de type féodal, voir même sa perte. Confronté à cette situation, l’être humain est invité à refuser d’accepter d’emblée une pseudo-vérité véhiculée par des médias peut-être à la solde de ces entreprises et groupes. Au contraire, il est invité à s’engager dans un processus de discernement et conscientisation afin de créer sa propre vérité par la confrontation de sa réalité nécessairement subjective à des données objectives, telles que révélées par la science, par exemple.

The penalty that good men pay for not being interested in politics is to be governed by men worse than themselves. - Plato

mercredi 9 décembre 2009

Global warming... Test it yourself.

Here's some analysis done online with this database. You can play with the data to see for yourself the trends of the so called global warming. I have used the NOAA GHCN Database with stations around Canada. Look at the graphs for details of how I created the graphs.

Here's two example


So you may ask, how did they get graphs showing warming? Good question. The short answer is adjustments... See this article for more information on the subject.

mardi 8 décembre 2009

Petition on Global Warming. Please go sign now!

Establish a Royal Commission to determine the cause and extent of Global Warming - Petition signatures - GoPetition

I am #905 to sign with this comment:

I have followed this anthropogenic global warming for many years now, never seen any evidence that the CO2 we put in the air is putting us or the planet in any danger.

Policies, politics, economics and lack of education are the biggest threats we and our planet faces.

CO2 is food for plants and natural. Trying to control CO2 is only based on a Malthusian agenda with a touch of opportunism for the "green" to buy indulgence and sell low efficient energy sources, they could not sell otherwise

UPDATE:
Is the science settled? if so, why do we have those scientist asking for proof?

The Copenhagen Climate Challenge
As of Dec 09, 2009, there is 141 scientist asking 10 questions to prove human CO2 is causing anything. They will host a conference Dec8,9th, 2009, here the programme.

Also this one with over 31,000 signature, or this one from a conference in New-York, with 114 signatures at the conference, 707 signatures not at the conference and 600 signatures from the public

Also those 450 Peer-Reviewed Papers Supporting Skepticism of "Man-Made" Global Warming

Establish a Royal Commission to determine the cause and extent of Global Warming - Petition signatures - GoPetition

Establish a Royal Commission to determine the cause and extent of Global Warming - Petition signatures - GoPetition

Climate Scare Story vs Real Questions and Answers

I invite you to listen to those two videos and compare how the climate scare is presented without any discussion on one side and a proper Q&A on the other side. Which one do you like more? Comments?