Simon Filiatrault

Voici la question qui me guide dans mes recherches...

L’appât du gain manifesté par les entreprises supranationales et certains groupes oligarchiques, de même que le contrôle des ressources naturelles par ceux-ci, dirigent l’humanité vers un nouvel ordre mondial de type féodal, voir même sa perte. Confronté à cette situation, l’être humain est invité à refuser d’accepter d’emblée une pseudo-vérité véhiculée par des médias peut-être à la solde de ces entreprises et groupes. Au contraire, il est invité à s’engager dans un processus de discernement et conscientisation afin de créer sa propre vérité par la confrontation de sa réalité nécessairement subjective à des données objectives, telles que révélées par la science, par exemple.

The penalty that good men pay for not being interested in politics is to be governed by men worse than themselves. - Plato

lundi 7 décembre 2009

Humour: Do we worry too much?

vendredi 4 décembre 2009

At last, some real data graphs on the climate

You should be aware of the ClimateGate scandal, the data manipulation, if not check the other entries in my blog...

So how much manipulation was done... a picture is worth a thousand words...

Thanks to Jo Nova, for a very well done article.

I am so tired about CLIMATE CHANGE and ClimateGate

Listen to this report from CTV.ca skip to minute 02:20.

At the end the interviews climate research Tom Duck said: I would be famous if I could prove "climate change" did not exist.

The issues are not about climate change. The issues are about the relation of anthropogenic CO2 and Climate Change.

The question should be:
Do we affect in a statistically significant way the earth climate with anthropogenic CO2?

Let me be clear:

No one denies that the climate is changing. It always has and always will be.
No one denies that CO2 play a part in the green house effect that permit us to live

Calling people who ask questions about the science, deniers, denialists, is unscientific.

Here's a list of 450 scientific papers that are "skeptics" about the main drivers on climate change.

The science is not settled
The consensus is not real
The main driver of climate change is not CO2.

Now for some REAL journalistic work we rarely see

jeudi 3 décembre 2009

Comment on REAL NEWS on ClimateGate

http://therealnews.com/t/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=31&Itemid=74&jumival=4537#comments

Climate Change... Not the real question... The climate has been changing for millions of years and will change in the future, even if we stop putting CO2 in the air. The real question; is there a clear link between anthropogenic CO2 and temperature.

All the talks about Copenhagen are to reduce emissions to stop warming and to avoid a 2 Celsius increase in global mean temperature. The global average temperature did not see any statistically significant increase in the last 10 years while CO2 have increased.

What if the science and consensus is wrong and curbing emissions will do nothing?
Many scientists are skeptic about the link between anthropogenic CO2 and the climate change issues. See those 450 papers.

http://www.populartechnology.net/2009/10/peer-reviewed-papers-supporting.html

This study done on real data shows a negative feedback of CO2 increase on the climate, contrary to the positive feedback of the computer models used by the IPCC to “prove” that we are causing harm to the planet. The science that claims those feedbacks has been debunked.

http://www.co2science.org/articles/V12/N48/EDIT.php

As we see here, the past climate as seen “worst“ temperature and CO2 concentration in the past than we have today.

http://www.geocraft.com/WVFossils/Carboniferous_climate.html

What is it that makes the actual temperature the best we can have?
What is it that makes the CO2 concentration we have the optimum?

Please document the REAL news, not some FAKE news that serves some “green” interest.

For more REAL information on the climate, consult: http://wattsupwiththat.com/