Voici la question qui me guide dans mes recherches...

L’appât du gain manifesté par les entreprises supranationales et certains groupes oligarchiques, de même que le contrôle des ressources naturelles par ceux-ci, dirigent l’humanité vers un nouvel ordre mondial de type féodal, voir même sa perte. Confronté à cette situation, l’être humain est invité à refuser d’accepter d’emblée une pseudo-vérité véhiculée par des médias peut-être à la solde de ces entreprises et groupes. Au contraire, il est invité à s’engager dans un processus de discernement et conscientisation afin de créer sa propre vérité par la confrontation de sa réalité nécessairement subjective à des données objectives, telles que révélées par la science, par exemple.

The penalty that good men pay for not being interested in politics is to be governed by men worse than themselves. - Plato

vendredi 4 juin 2010

Different points of view of the Israel Gaza humanitarian aid convoy

There are always different points of view on any conflict.

Here I list 3 points of view that I stumble upon.

First you have the point of view of pro-Israel and terrorist plot.

Al Qaeda on Board? Who Was on the Flotilla the Israelis Raided?


Second you have the humanitarian point of view, I would say not pro-Israel view of Democracy now.

Huwaida Arraf, chairperson of the Free Gaza Movement, and retired US Col. Ann Wright were on the flotilla when it was attacked. They join us to describe the assault and their subsequent detention in Israeli prison. We also speak to Sawsan Zaher, a staff attorney at Adalah, the Legal Center for Arab Minority Rights in Israel, who interviewed many of the activists in detention.


Source 

Israel’s deputy ambassador to the United Nations, Daniel Carmon, speaks to Democracy Now! and defends the Israeli attack on the Gaza aid flotilla that killed at least nine people in international waters. "Israel enforced a maritime blockade, which is a measure that is totally legal in international law, to enforce a blockade when there is a possibility of a danger emanating from some source. And this was exactly the case."


Source

Third, you have the common sense point of view of Dan Carlin on the subject.
Everything discussed in this show is likely to get a lot of people angry.  From Israeli naval raids to U.N. control of U.S. foreign policy, Dan probably won't be able to avoid making you mad. Sorry.


Any opinions?

Posted by Simon Filiatrault à 06 h 23
Libelé

Aucun commentaire:

Publier un commentaire

S'abonner à : Publier des commentaires (Atom)