Voici la question qui me guide dans mes recherches...

L’appât du gain manifesté par les entreprises supranationales et certains groupes oligarchiques, de même que le contrôle des ressources naturelles par ceux-ci, dirigent l’humanité vers un nouvel ordre mondial de type féodal, voir même sa perte. Confronté à cette situation, l’être humain est invité à refuser d’accepter d’emblée une pseudo-vérité véhiculée par des médias peut-être à la solde de ces entreprises et groupes. Au contraire, il est invité à s’engager dans un processus de discernement et conscientisation afin de créer sa propre vérité par la confrontation de sa réalité nécessairement subjective à des données objectives, telles que révélées par la science, par exemple.

The penalty that good men pay for not being interested in politics is to be governed by men worse than themselves. - Plato

jeudi 30 juillet 2009

Overpopulation: Myth or Reality?

Very nice little vidéo...


Consult their web site for more info.

Their calculation shows that the whole earth population would fit inside Texas on a plot of land 66 feet by 66 feet in house of 4. The calculation seems to be good.

So... Next time you hear someone tell you we have too much people on the planet, ask them why?

UPDATE (August-7 2009):
Tim Ball as written a very good article on the subject of why... read on

vendredi 17 juillet 2009

Inside The Great American Bubble Machine - Goldman Sachs

This all smells like deep corruptions inside government and companies, included here are small excerpt from an interview with Matt Taibbi at democracy now, who wrote the article in Rolling Stones magazine. Make sure you follow the links below.

Source1, Source2 (with video)

Goldman Sachs, the nation’s most powerful financial company, has reported the richest quarterly profit in its 140-year history: $3.44 billion between April and June. Goldman’s record profits come just one month after it repaid $10 billion of TARP money to the US Treasury, freeing itself from restrictions on year-end bonuses. We speak to Matt Taibbi, whose new Rolling Stone article argues that “Goldman Sachs has engineered every major market manipulation since the Great Depression.”



What’s interesting about that is that the guy who is now the president of the New York Fed, Dudley, is another former Goldman Sachs banker

Goldman Sachs is positioned in a number of different ways. They are a part owner of the Chicago Climate Exchange, which is where the carbon credits will be traded if this legislation goes through. They’re also heavily invested in a number of companies that deal in carbon credits. And again, this is another kind of commodities market, like the oil commodities market, which exploded last summer and is exploding again now. And Goldman and banks like Morgan Stanley are poised to make an enormous amount of money if these carbon credits end up getting traded

Goldman was able to appeal to its former chief, Hank Paulson in the Treasury, who engineered an $80 billion taxpayer-funded bailout of AIG, and immediately about 13 billion or 14 billion of those dollars went directly to Goldman Sachs. So this was really Goldman Sachs bailing out Goldman Sachs in the middle of the bailout.

What you need to know is the big picture: If America is circling the drain, Goldman Sachs has found a way to be that drain — an extremely unfortunate loophole in the system of Western democratic capitalism, which never foresaw that in a society governed passively by free markets and free elections, organized greed always defeats disorganized democracy.

mercredi 15 juillet 2009

Global Cooling Chills Summer 2009

Here's a copy of a nice analysis by Deroy Murdock on the past cooling we have experienced...

Source

Let the cold times roll.

By Deroy Murdock

As cap-and-trade advocates tie their knickers in knots over so-called “global warming,” Mother Nature refuses to cooperate. Earth’s temperatures continue a chilling trend that began eleven years ago. As global cooling accelerates, global-warmists kick, scream, and push their pet theory — just like little kids who cover their ears and stomp their feet when older children tell them not to bother waiting up for Santa Claus on Christmas Eve.

Consider how the globe cooled last month:

  • June in Manhattan averaged 67.5 degrees Fahrenheit, 3.7 degrees below normal — the coldest average since 1958. The National Weather Service stated on July 1: “The last time that Central Park hit 85 in May . . . but not in June was back in 1903.”
  • In Phoenix, June’s high temperatures were below 100 degrees for 15 days straight, the first such June since 1913. In California’s desert, Yucca Valley’s June average was 83.5, 8.5 degrees below normal. Not far away, downtown Los Angeles averaged 74.5 degrees, five below normal.
  • Boston saw temperatures 4.7 degrees below normal. “This is the second coldest average high temp since 1872,” veteran meteorologist and Weather Channel alumnus Joseph D’Aleo reports at Icecap.com. “1903 is the record.” D’Aleo told me, “It has been so cool and so cloudy that trees in northern New England are starting to show colors that normally first appear in September.” Looking abroad, D’Aleo noted: “Southern Brazil had one of the coldest Junes in decades, and New Zealand has had unusual cold and snow again this year.”
  • New Zealand’s National Climate Centre issued a June 2 press release headlined, “TEMPERATURE: LOWEST EVER FOR MAY FOR MANY AREAS, COLDER THAN NORMAL FOR ALL.
  • South African officials say cold weather killed two vagrants in the Eastern Cape. Both slept outdoors the evening of June 26 and froze to death.
  • July also has been more than a bit brisk.


“FREAK SUMMER STORM DUMPS SNOW ON YONKERS,” the New York Post blared after a July 8 storm brought a wintry mix to that city just north of Gotham. That same day, the high temperature reached 65 degrees at O’Hare International Airport, making it Chicago’s coldest July 8 since 1891. Meanwhile, in Melbourne, Australia, temperatures have been 10 degrees below average, while frost has covered lawns and windshields. On July 13, Albert Gore will appear in Melbourne to explain to Australians that they are shivering due to warming.

Simmer down, global-warmists retort. These are mere anecdotes, handpicked to make us look silly.

Well, one would be foolish to challenge space-borne satellites that gauge Earth’s mean temperatures — cold, hot, and average. Here again, evidence of global cooling piles up like snow drifts.

Lower Troposhperic Global Temperatures

There has been no significant global warming since 1995, no warming since 1998, and global cooling for the past few years,” former U.S. Senate Environment Committee spokesman Marc Morano writes at ClimateDepot.com. Citing metrics gathered by University of Alabama–Huntsville’s Dr. Roy Spencer, Morano adds: “The latest global averaged satellite temperature data for June 2009 reveal yet another drop in Earth’s temperature. . . . Despite his dire warnings, the Earth has cooled 0.74 degrees F since former Vice President Al Gore released An Inconvenient Truth in 2006.”

Earth’s temperatures fall even as the planet spins within what global-warmists consider a thickening cloud of toxic carbon dioxide. (Never mind that fauna exhale it, and flora devour it.)

The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s Earth System Research Laboratory at Mauna Loa, Hawaii, consistently and reliably has measured CO2 for the last 50 years. CO2 concentrations have risen steadily for a half century.

Atmospheric CO2 at Mauna Loa Observatory

For December 1958, the laboratory reported an atmospheric CO2 concentration of 314.67 parts per million (PPM). Flash forward to December 1998, about when global cooling reappeared. CO2 already had increased to 366.87 PPM. By December 2008, CO2 had advanced to 385.54 PPM, a significant 5.088 percent growth in one decade.

This capsizes the carbon-phobic global-warmist argument. For Earth’s temperatures to sink while CO2 rises contradicts global-warmism as thoroughly as learning that firefighters can battle blazes by spraying them with gasoline.

Global Temperatures vs. CO2

So, to defeat so-called “global warming,” there is no need for the $864 billion Waxman-Markey cap-and-trade bill, a Kyoto successor treaty, elaborate new regulations, or United Nations guidelines. Instead, let the cold times roll.

Alan Carlin, a Caltech-trained physicist and 35-year-veteran Environmental Protection Agency analyst, recently raised some of these issues in a 98-page paper he and a colleague co-authored. “We believe our concerns and reservations are sufficiently important to warrant a serious review of the science by EPA,” they wrote.

As the Wall Street Journal’s Kim Strassel detailed July 6, the Obama administration ordered Carlin to clam up.

His boss, Al McGartland, e-mailed Carlin to prohibit “any direct communication” on his paper with anyone outside his office. McGartland later told Carlin: “You need to move on to other issues and subjects. I don’t want you to spend any additional EPA time on climate change. No papers, no research etc., at least until we see what EPA is going to do with Climate.”

It is one thing to have a national debate about a serious problem, with adults differing over which solution might work best. Reasonable people, for instance, can dispute whether growing federal involvement would heal or inflame our health-care system’s serious maladies.

But as so-called “global warming” proves fictional, those who would shackle the economy with taxes and regulations to fight mythology increasingly resemble deinstitutionalized derelicts on an urban street corner, wildly swatting at their own imaginary monsters.

New York commentator Deroy Murdock is a nationally syndicated columnist with the Scripps Howard News Service and a media fellow with the Hoover Institution on War, Revolution, and Peace at Stanford University.

vendredi 10 juillet 2009

The FED does not want to be scrutinized

Big news that did not make the front page:

The Federal Reserve warned on Thursday that a growing congressional threat to curtail its independence would destabilise markets and raise the cost of servicing US debt for “current and future generations”.

Ron Paul, the Texas Republican, has gathered the support of a majority of the House of Representatives for a bill that would audit the Fed’s monetary policy decisions. He told a Congressional hearing he wanted the power to prevent the Fed being "secret and clandestine and serving special interests”.

More on the proponent of this bill:
http://www.ronpaul.com/on-the-issues/audit-the-federal-reserve-hr-1207/

lundi 6 juillet 2009

USA : Climate change Bill debate

Interesting... The USA is about the vote on the Waxman-Markey bill that will probably be worst than any effect CO2 may have in the next hundreds of years... Listen to this.



More about this in the news:

Fuel Standards Are Killing GM
Alan Reynolds, Wall Street Journal, 2 July 2009

Cap-and-Trade Can’t Deliver Jobs
Detroit News editorial, 2 July 2009

The Enron Revitalization Act of 2009
Robert Bradley, MasterResource.org, 1 July 2009

Facts, Costs, Consequences: Who Cares?
David Harsanyi, Denver Post, 1 July 2009

Global Warming Debate Isn’t Close to Settled
Jeff Jacoby, Boston Globe, 1 July 2009

Americans Will Suffer So Dems Can “Save the Planet”
Jay Ambrose, Orange County Register, 1 July 2009

Democrats Vulnerable after Climate Vote
Jonathan Martin & Alex Isenstadt, Politico, 30 June 2009

Waxman-Markey Flunks Math
Rich Karlgaard, Forbes, 30 June 2009

Climate Bill Hurts the Least among Us
Kenneth W. Chilton, Detroit News, 30 June 2009

Waxman-Markey Is Hilarious, But the Joke’s on Us
Myron Ebell, Townhall, 29 June 2009

ACES Up Her Sleeve
Jeremy Lott & William Yeatman, American Spectator, 29 June 2009

EPA Quashes Dissent on Climate Change
John Hinderaker, PowerLine, 28 June 2009

Creating Green Jobs Means Destroying Other Jobs
Boston Herald editorial, 28 June 2009

The Utterly Misbegotten Climate Bill
John Steele Gordon, Commentary, 27 June 2009

Carbon-gate
Investor’s Business Daily editorial, 26 June 2009


samedi 4 juillet 2009

Political corruption at the EPA? Science is loosing!

According to this article and Alan Carlin, the EPA has removed this 98 page report because it did not met the "agenda" of the "administration"... To put it simply, science as been put aside to meet the political agenda of the "greens".

. . . Mr. Carlin and a colleague presented a 98-page analysis arguing the agency should take another look, as the science behind man-made global warming is inconclusive at best. The analysis noted that global temperatures were on a downward trend. It pointed out problems with climate models. It highlighted new research that contradicts apocalyptic scenarios. "We believe our concerns and reservations are sufficiently important to warrant a serious review of the science by EPA," the report read.

The response to Mr. Carlin was an email from his boss, Al McGartland, forbidding him from "any direct communication" with anyone outside of his office with regard to his analysis. When Mr. Carlin tried again to disseminate his analysis, Mr. McGartland decreed: "The administrator and the administration have decided to move forward on endangerment, and your comments do not help the legal or policy case for this decision. . . . I can only see one impact of your comments given where we are in the process, and that would be a very negative impact on our office . . .



jeudi 2 juillet 2009

Nutrition du futur : une usine japonaise produit des légumes "parfaits"

Source ici et ici

Japon – Des scientifiques japonais ont développé une nouvelle façon de cultiver les légumes dans un environnement parfaitement contrôlé et stérilisé. Selon eux, il semble que ces légumes "parfaits" puissent être la nourriture de demain.

Ces usines de cultures de légumes se développent à travers tout le pays et peuvent produire des laitues 24 heures sur 24, sept jours sur sept. Ces salades par exemple, sont récoltées jusqu’à 20 fois par an. En tout, certaines de ces usines peuvent produire 3 millions de légumes par an.

Chaque aspect de l’environnement de la plante y est contrôlé : de la lumière à la température, en passant par le degré d’humidité et l’arrosage. Les niveaux de CO2 peuvent être minutieusement modifiés. Dans l’usine, les producteurs portent des gants, un masque et une combinaison protectrice, comme on en voit habituellement dans les usines chimiques.

Les cultures ne peuvent être contaminées ni par la poussière, ni par les insectes, ni par l’air. Dans cet environnement stérile, aucun pesticide n’est nécessaire. Les consommateurs japonais peuvent donc manger ces légumes en vente chez les primeurs en toute sécurité et sans les laver.

Le gouvernement japonais, qui s’inquiète de l’usage de substances chimiques sur les cultures, a encouragé l’expansion des usines à légumes. Un porte-parole de l’une d'entre elles, Ozu Corporation à Tokyo, déclare : « Une production stable est garantie toute l’année grâce au contrôle de la lumière, de la température, de l’humidité et du dioxyde de carbone. Cela répond à la demande des consommateurs qui cherchent des aliments sains ».

Ces usines vont bientôt s’implanter au Royaume-Uni, où l’on trouve déjà de nombreuses cultures hors-sol. Chaque année, des millions de tomates hydroponiques sont cultivées dans d’immenses serres au sud de l’Angleterre.