Analyse du plan énergétique d'Obama

Voici deux analyses du plan énergétique d'Obama et de son secrétaire à l'énergie Steven Chu.

Rod Adams du Atomic show analyse les questions soumissent à Steven Chu par le comité sénatorial sur l'énergie et ressources naturel.

---

John Wheeler du podcast "This week in nuclear" compare l'éolien, le solaire et le nucléaire. Quel serait l'énergie total produite avec un invetissement de 350 milliard de dollars.




Voici mon commentaire sur l'analyse de John:

John,

Very good analysis... Thanks for the work.

Since around 87% of the total energy use in our societies is from fossil fuels.
Since all work we do cost energy.
Since burning fossil fuel pollute and has an impact on nature and human life.

We can therefore say that using those billions to build wind power will pollute and consume 2.2x more than nuclear
(26153/10309)*87% by the way, you are very generous in your calculation of wind.

The same calculation on solar give 12.6x more pollution and consumption of fossil fuel than nuclear.

We also need to talk about the fact the fossil fuel reserves are depleting fast. If we build those low density power source that pollute more and consume more fossil fuel, we are going to deplete the reserves before we have the time and resources to build all the nuclear infrastructure needed to support the world growing energy and desalination needs for fresh water.

---

Après avoir étudié et écouté ces deux podcast, ma conclusion est que le monde ne comprend pas l'importance d'utiliser des sources d'énergie dense, non polluante et moins coûteuse.