Voici la question qui me guide dans mes recherches...

L’appât du gain manifesté par les entreprises supranationales et certains groupes oligarchiques, de même que le contrôle des ressources naturelles par ceux-ci, dirigent l’humanité vers un nouvel ordre mondial de type féodal, voir même sa perte. Confronté à cette situation, l’être humain est invité à refuser d’accepter d’emblée une pseudo-vérité véhiculée par des médias peut-être à la solde de ces entreprises et groupes. Au contraire, il est invité à s’engager dans un processus de discernement et conscientisation afin de créer sa propre vérité par la confrontation de sa réalité nécessairement subjective à des données objectives, telles que révélées par la science, par exemple.

The penalty that good men pay for not being interested in politics is to be governed by men worse than themselves. - Plato

jeudi 24 juin 2010

Climate Change Endoheretics Scientists

  • Heresy comes from the Greek hairetikos "able to choose".
  • Heresy is a controversial or novel change to a system of beliefs.
  • Isaac Asimov called Endoheretics appropriately credentialed scientists.
  • The leader of a heretical movement is called a Heresiarch, thus the heresiarch title goes to Al Gore.
  • The Heretics are the followers of the belief system surrounding climate change, thus the IPCC falls in this category
A new “study” has been published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS) which has examined the credentials and publication records of climate scientists who are global warming skeptics versus those who accept the “tenets of anthropogenic climate change”.

For decades governments have thrown hundreds of millions of dollars at Endoheretics climate scientists who sought to find links between human behaviors and global warming. Those inevitably publish their results. Now, we have a paper miraculously announcing that the weight of publications are in favor of those who support this hypothesis that sought to find the said conclusion?

Do you see the fallacy of this circular logic, where the proposition to be proved is assumed implicitly or explicitly in one of the premises.

Read more here


"YOU DARE CHALLENGE GLOBAL WARMING WITH SCIENTIFIC DEBATE?"

Aucun commentaire: